Browse all 650 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 184
US market 62
Country 92
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 112
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Columbia Research Enhanced Core (RECS)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Global · Expense ratio 0.15 % · ISIN US19761L7064
Price history (since 2019)
Monthly close since 2019. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 12.1 % | −55.9 % | 74 |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 11.4 % | −47.0 % | 82 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 4.6 % | −9.8 % | 68 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 2.4 % | −62.3 % | 83 |
| Micron Technology Inc MU | 2.2 % | −84.5 % | 74 |
| Bank of America Corp BAC | 2.0 % | −18.7 % | 59 |
| Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund ETF Shares VOX | 1.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| Chevron Corp CVX | 1.5 % | −57.2 % | 54 |
| Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® Fund XLC | 1.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| The TJX Companies Inc TJX | 1.3 % | −35.3 % | 70 |
| Altria Group MO | 1.2 % | +17.6 % | 85 |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company BMY | 1.1 % | +12.3 % | 80 |
| Citigroup Inc. C | 1.1 % | −12.4 % | 51 |
| Starbucks Corporation SBUX | 1.0 % | −47.1 % | 57 |
| Cisco Systems Inc CSCO | 1.0 % | −26.6 % | 74 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR | 1.0 % | −92.9 % | 70 |
| CVS Health Corp CVS | 1.0 % | −56.5 % | 57 |
| Charles Schwab Corp SCHW | 0.9 % | −38.9 % | 70 |
| Parker-Hannifin Corporation PH | 0.9 % | −58.0 % | 66 |
| Automatic Data Processing Inc ADP | 0.9 % | −36.9 % | 71 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | 0.7 % | −38.6 % | 74 |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 0.7 % | −68.2 % | 87 |
| Elevance Health Inc ELV | 0.7 % | +5.1 % | 62 |
| General Motors Company GM | 0.7 % | +2.9 % | 48 |
| Newmont Goldcorp Corp NEM | 0.7 % | −9.9 % | 69 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 49 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +65.2 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +56.4 % below FV
- 3 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +52.9 % below FV
- 4 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +44.4 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF +38.3 % below FV
- 6 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +29.9 % below FV
- 7 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +28.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +18.6 % below FV
- 9 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +17.9 % below FV
- 10 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +8.4 % below FV
Frequently asked about RECS
Is RECS overvalued?
What is the fair value of RECS?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of RECS?
What is the expense ratio of RECS?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Columbia ETF Trust I - Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 4, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.