Browse all 652 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 186
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index (FMAT)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Sector · Expense ratio 0.08 % · ISIN US3160928814
Price history (since 2013)
Monthly close since 2013. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linde plc Ordinary Shares LIN | 15.8 % | −10.2 % | 69 |
| Newmont Goldcorp Corp NEM | 8.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc FCX | 7.3 % | −77.3 % | 53 |
| Sherwin-Williams Co SHW | 5.1 % | −53.2 % | 63 |
| Ecolab Inc ECL | 5.0 % | −66.2 % | 62 |
| Air Products and Chemicals Inc APD | 4.3 % | −16.0 % | 36 |
| CRH PLC CRH | 3.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| Nucor Corp NUE | 3.9 % | −54.1 % | 60 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc STLD | 2.3 % | −46.8 % | 59 |
| Vulcan Materials Company VMC | 2.3 % | −45.9 % | 67 |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc MLM | 2.1 % | −56.0 % | 56 |
| PPG Industries Inc PPG | 1.7 % | −26.4 % | 78 |
| Smurfit WestRock plc SW | 1.6 % | +6.3 % | 39 |
| International Flavors & Fragrances Inc IFF | 1.5 % | −49.1 % | 43 |
| Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co RS | 1.4 % | −47.6 % | 68 |
| Packaging Corp of America PKG | 1.4 % | −43.8 % | 58 |
| Dow Inc DOW | 1.4 % | +47.2 % | 34 |
| Royal Gold Inc RGLD | 1.4 % | −5.1 % | 37 |
| Amcor PLC AMCR | 1.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Amerize Inc. AMRZ | 1.3 % | n/a | n/a |
| CF Industries Holdings Inc CF | 1.2 % | −2.0 % | 80 |
| Coeur Mining Inc CDE | 1.2 % | −3.0 % | 55 |
| International Paper IP | 1.1 % | −32.3 % | 23 |
| LyondellBasell Industries NV LYB | 1.1 % | −59.3 % | 40 |
| Ball Corporation BALL | 1.0 % | −19.7 % | 53 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 49 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +76.9 % below FV
- 2 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 3 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +37.1 % below FV
- 4 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +32.2 % below FV
- 5 VOX Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund ETF Shares +21.5 % below FV
- 6 XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® Fund +20.6 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.1 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +15.2 % below FV
- 9 SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF +14.6 % below FV
- 10 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +14.5 % below FV
Frequently asked about FMAT
Is FMAT overvalued?
What is the fair value of FMAT?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of FMAT?
What is the expense ratio of FMAT?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Fidelity® MSCI Materials Index ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Oct 15, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.