Browse all 651 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 185
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Columbia Research Enhanced Value (REVS)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.19 % · ISIN US19761L8054
Price history (since 2019)
Monthly close since 2019. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 8.9 % | +2.8 % | 82 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 7.4 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Bank of America Corp BAC | 3.5 % | −25.5 % | 59 |
| Chevron Corp CVX | 2.8 % | −55.9 % | 55 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 2.4 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Altria Group MO | 2.3 % | +18.7 % | 85 |
| Citigroup Inc. C | 1.9 % | −20.1 % | 51 |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company BMY | 1.7 % | +24.3 % | 80 |
| Cisco Systems Inc CSCO | 1.6 % | +10.0 % | 74 |
| Charles Schwab Corp SCHW | 1.6 % | +17.8 % | 71 |
| The TJX Companies Inc TJX | 1.5 % | −35.4 % | 69 |
| Newmont Goldcorp Corp NEM | 1.4 % | +10.0 % | 69 |
| General Motors Company GM | 1.4 % | +21.1 % | 48 |
| CVS Health Corp CVS | 1.4 % | −50.5 % | 57 |
| Progressive Corp PGR | 1.3 % | −21.1 % | 65 |
| Target Corporation TGT | 1.3 % | −23.1 % | 60 |
| Elevance Health Inc ELV | 1.2 % | +16.7 % | 62 |
| AbbVie Inc ABBV | 1.2 % | −2.0 % | 73 |
| ConocoPhillips COP | 1.2 % | −29.6 % | 58 |
| Nextera Energy Inc NEE | 1.1 % | −61.2 % | 47 |
| Equinix Inc EQIX | 1.1 % | −86.8 % | 48 |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation BK | 1.0 % | n/a | n/a |
| Ford Motor Company F | 1.0 % | +60.0 % | 41 |
| General Dynamics Corporation GD | 0.9 % | −20.1 % | 67 |
| Cigna Corp CI | 0.9 % | +84.7 % | 67 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 50 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +87.2 % below FV
- 2 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +57.2 % below FV
- 3 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +43.7 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 5 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +31.4 % below FV
- 6 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +26.0 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.4 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +19.3 % below FV
- 9 ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF +18.3 % below FV
- 10 XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF +17.9 % below FV
Frequently asked about REVS
Is REVS overvalued?
What is the fair value of REVS?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of REVS?
What is the expense ratio of REVS?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 25, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.