Browse all 652 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 184
US market 64
Country 92
Core UCITS 16
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT)
Look-through valuation · Theme · Expense ratio 0.75 % · ISIN US37954Y8553
Price history (since 2010)
Monthly close since 2010. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Tinto ADR RIO | 22.5 % | +3.5 % | 54 |
| NAURA Technology Group Co Ltd 002371 | 7.1 % | −72.2 % | 50 |
| Panasonic Corp 6752 | 6.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| TDK Corp 6762 | 5.3 % | n/a | n/a |
| Albemarle Corp ALB | 4.7 % | −22.8 % | 54 |
| Samsung SDI 006400 | 4.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A 300750 | 3.9 % | −13.2 % | 63 |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 3.8 % | −93.2 % | 37 |
| LG Energy Solution Ltd 373220 | 3.6 % | −44.9 % | 33 |
| BYD Company Limited 1211 | 3.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| EVE Energy 300014 | 3.4 % | −45.6 % | 40 |
| Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B SQM | 3.2 % | −61.9 % | 58 |
| Pilbara Minerals Ltd PLS | 3.0 % | n/a | n/a |
| Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium Co Ltd 002460 | 2.6 % | −69.6 % | 44 |
| Mineral Resources Ltd MIN | 2.4 % | +52.5 % | 28 |
| Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co Ltd 002709 | 2.3 % | −70.7 % | 66 |
| Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries Inc 002466 | 2.1 % | −70.3 % | 55 |
| Enersys ENS | 2.1 % | −14.4 % | 70 |
| Wuxi Lead Auto Equipment Co Ltd 300450 | 1.7 % | −19.9 % | 71 |
| Sinomine Resource Exploration Co Ltd 002738 | 1.4 % | −75.6 % | 48 |
| Yunnan Chuangxin New Material Co Ltd 002812 | 1.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Ecopro BM. Co. Ltd 247540 | 1.3 % | −89.3 % | 41 |
| IGO Ltd IGO | 1.1 % | −75.4 % | 49 |
| Sunwoda Electronic 300207 | 1.1 % | −45.2 % | 38 |
| Shanghai Putailai New Energy Technology Co.Ltd. 603659 | 1.0 % | −34.0 % | 60 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 38 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +71.9 % below FV
- 2 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +53.7 % below FV
- 3 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +48.5 % below FV
- 4 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF +36.0 % below FV
- 5 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +33.5 % below FV
- 6 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +32.5 % below FV
- 7 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +28.0 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +13.7 % below FV
- 9 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +12.7 % below FV
- 10 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +10.8 % below FV
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Aug 14, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.