Browse all 652 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 186
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech (LIT)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Theme · Expense ratio 0.75 % · ISIN US37954Y8553
Price history (since 2010)
Monthly close since 2010. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Tinto ADR RIO | 22.6 % | −18.5 % | 55 |
| Panasonic Corp 6752 | 7.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| TDK Corp 6762 | 6.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| NAURA Technology Group Co Ltd 002371 | 6.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Samsung SDI 006400 | 5.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 4.6 % | −89.1 % | 49 |
| LG Energy Solution Ltd 373220 | 4.3 % | −52.3 % | 33 |
| Albemarle Corp ALB | 4.0 % | +17.7 % | 42 |
| EVE Energy 300014 | 3.3 % | −35.7 % | 40 |
| BYD Company Limited 1211 | 3.1 % | n/a | n/a |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A 300750 | 3.1 % | +147.2 % | 62 |
| Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B SQM | 3.1 % | −48.4 % | 59 |
| Pilbara Minerals Ltd PLS | 2.5 % | +105.7 % | 72 |
| Enersys ENS | 2.3 % | −5.5 % | 70 |
| Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium Co Ltd 002460 | 2.3 % | −61.7 % | 44 |
| Mineral Resources Ltd MIN | 2.0 % | +13.0 % | 60 |
| Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co Ltd 002709 | 1.9 % | −63.2 % | 65 |
| Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries Inc 002466 | 1.9 % | −62.4 % | 54 |
| Wuxi Lead Auto Equipment Co Ltd 300450 | 1.8 % | +43.8 % | 71 |
| Ecopro BM. Co. Ltd 247540 | 1.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Sunwoda Electronic 300207 | 1.4 % | −48.6 % | 38 |
| Sinomine Resource Exploration Co Ltd 002738 | 1.2 % | −43.2 % | 49 |
| Yunnan Chuangxin New Material Co Ltd 002812 | 1.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Shanghai Putailai New Energy Technology Co.Ltd. 603659 | 1.0 % | −4.0 % | 59 |
| IGO Ltd IGO | 1.0 % | +6.3 % | 72 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 38 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +76.9 % below FV
- 2 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 3 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +37.1 % below FV
- 4 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +32.2 % below FV
- 5 VOX Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund ETF Shares +21.5 % below FV
- 6 XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® Fund +20.6 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.1 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +15.2 % below FV
- 9 SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF +14.6 % below FV
- 10 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +14.5 % below FV
Frequently asked about LIT
Is LIT overvalued?
What is the fair value of LIT?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of LIT?
What is the expense ratio of LIT?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Oct 15, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.