Browse all 650 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 184
US market 62
Country 92
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 112
Theme 45
Dividend 37
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth (IUSG)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.04 % · ISIN US4642876712
Price history (since 2000)
Monthly close since 2000. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 14.1 % | −55.9 % | 74 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 9.9 % | −23.3 % | 66 |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 6.4 % | −47.0 % | 82 |
| Alphabet Inc Class A GOOGL | 5.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Broadcom Inc AVGO | 4.7 % | −67.8 % | 70 |
| Alphabet Inc Class C GOOG | 4.2 % | −56.5 % | 70 |
| Amazon.com Inc AMZN | 3.5 % | −49.9 % | 54 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 3.4 % | −9.8 % | 68 |
| Micron Technology Inc MU | 2.8 % | −84.5 % | 74 |
| BRKB BRKB | 2.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Eli Lilly and Company LLY | 2.4 % | −66.4 % | 69 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD | 2.0 % | −88.0 % | 75 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co JPM | 1.7 % | −38.8 % | 65 |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 1.7 % | −93.8 % | 37 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR | 1.1 % | −92.9 % | 70 |
| Johnson & Johnson JNJ | 1.0 % | −38.6 % | 82 |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 1.0 % | −68.2 % | 87 |
| Caterpillar Inc CAT | 1.0 % | −61.1 % | 65 |
| Applied Materials Inc AMAT | 0.9 % | −58.2 % | 77 |
| Netflix Inc NFLX | 0.9 % | −40.3 % | 87 |
| Visa Inc. Class A V | 0.9 % | −47.6 % | 82 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 0.8 % | −62.3 % | 83 |
| RTX Corporation RTX | 0.7 % | −56.0 % | 63 |
| GE Vernova LLC GEV | 0.6 % | −85.7 % | 65 |
| Cisco Systems Inc CSCO | 0.6 % | −26.6 % | 74 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 394 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +65.2 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +56.4 % below FV
- 3 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +52.9 % below FV
- 4 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +44.4 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF +38.3 % below FV
- 6 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +29.9 % below FV
- 7 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +28.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +18.6 % below FV
- 9 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +17.9 % below FV
- 10 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +8.4 % below FV
Frequently asked about IUSG
Is IUSG overvalued?
What is the fair value of IUSG?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of IUSG?
What is the expense ratio of IUSG?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 4, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.