Browse all 651 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 185
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth (IUSG)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.04 % · ISIN US4642876712
Price history (since 2000)
Monthly close since 2000. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 14.2 % | −12.0 % | 74 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 9.5 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 6.4 % | +2.8 % | 82 |
| Alphabet Inc Class A GOOGL | 5.3 % | −1.3 % | 70 |
| Broadcom Inc AVGO | 4.4 % | −14.6 % | 71 |
| Alphabet Inc Class C GOOG | 4.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 4.2 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Amazon.com Inc AMZN | 3.4 % | −48.9 % | 56 |
| Micron Technology Inc MU | 3.2 % | −85.9 % | 74 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD | 2.6 % | −80.0 % | 75 |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc BRK-B | 2.4 % | −21.9 % | 56 |
| Eli Lilly and Company LLY | 2.4 % | −31.2 % | 69 |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 1.7 % | −88.6 % | 40 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co JPM | 1.6 % | −43.1 % | 65 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR | 1.1 % | −77.6 % | 69 |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 1.0 % | −33.0 % | 86 |
| Johnson & Johnson JNJ | 1.0 % | −37.2 % | 80 |
| Applied Materials Inc AMAT | 1.0 % | −22.0 % | 77 |
| Caterpillar Inc CAT | 1.0 % | −62.1 % | 65 |
| Visa Inc. Class A V | 0.9 % | −37.1 % | 82 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 0.8 % | −36.3 % | 83 |
| Netflix Inc NFLX | 0.8 % | +11.2 % | 87 |
| Sandisk Corp SNDK | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| RTX Corporation RTX | 0.7 % | −54.0 % | 63 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc CRWD | 0.7 % | −86.6 % | 49 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 398 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +87.2 % below FV
- 2 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +57.2 % below FV
- 3 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +43.7 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 5 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +31.4 % below FV
- 6 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +26.0 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.4 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +19.3 % below FV
- 9 ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF +18.3 % below FV
- 10 XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF +17.9 % below FV
Frequently asked about IUSG
Is IUSG overvalued?
What is the fair value of IUSG?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of IUSG?
What is the expense ratio of IUSG?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 25, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.