Browse all 650 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 184
US market 62
Country 92
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 112
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia (FLSP)
Look-through valuation · Global · Expense ratio 0.65 % · ISIN US35473P5465
Price history (since 2019)
Monthly close since 2019. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc Class C GOOG | 1.8 % | −56.5 % | 70 |
| Micron Technology Inc MU | 1.7 % | −84.5 % | 74 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 1.5 % | −23.3 % | 66 |
| Salesforce.com Inc CRM | 1.3 % | −3.0 % | 84 |
| General Electric Company GCP | 1.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 1.2 % | −68.2 % | 87 |
| Walt Disney Company DIS | 1.2 % | −12.9 % | 64 |
| Cisco Systems Inc CSCO | 1.2 % | −26.6 % | 74 |
| Citigroup Inc. C | 1.2 % | −12.4 % | 51 |
| Gilead Sciences Inc GILD | 1.1 % | −2.1 % | 83 |
| RTX Corporation RTX | 1.1 % | −56.0 % | 63 |
| Toronto Dominion Bank 8640 | 1.1 % | n/a | n/a |
| Morgan Stanley MS | 1.0 % | −34.4 % | 67 |
| Roche Holding AG ROP | 1.0 % | n/a | n/a |
| Booking Holdings Inc BKNG | 0.9 % | −23.4 % | 88 |
| Recruit Holdings Co Ltd 6098 | 0.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| Advantest Corp. 6857 | 0.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| Applied Materials Inc AMAT | 0.9 % | −58.2 % | 77 |
| Newmont Goldcorp Corp NEM | 0.9 % | −9.9 % | 69 |
| Sony Corp 6758 | 0.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company BMY | 0.8 % | +12.3 % | 80 |
| Uber Technologies Inc UBER | 0.8 % | −42.9 % | 68 |
| Adobe Systems Incorporated ADBE | 0.7 % | +62.3 % | 94 |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc VRTX | 0.7 % | −49.9 % | 79 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corp MPC | 0.7 % | −65.6 % | 61 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 26 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +65.2 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +56.4 % below FV
- 3 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +52.9 % below FV
- 4 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +44.4 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF +38.3 % below FV
- 6 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +29.9 % below FV
- 7 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +28.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +18.6 % below FV
- 9 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +17.9 % below FV
- 10 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +8.4 % below FV
Frequently asked about FLSP
Is FLSP overvalued?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of FLSP?
What is the expense ratio of FLSP?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 4, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.