Browse all 650 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 184
US market 62
Country 92
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 112
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Global X Defense Tech (SHLD)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Theme · Expense ratio 0.50 % · ISIN US37960A5294
Price history (since 2023)
Monthly close since 2023. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR | 10.6 % | −92.9 % | 70 |
| RTX Corporation RTX | 9.4 % | −56.0 % | 63 |
| General Dynamics Corporation GD | 8.7 % | −24.7 % | 66 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation LMT | 8.2 % | +1.2 % | 68 |
| Northrop Grumman Corporation NOC | 7.8 % | −31.9 % | 65 |
| BAE Systems plc BA | 4.6 % | −40.2 % | 65 |
| Rheinmetall AG RHM | 4.0 % | n/a | n/a |
| L3Harris Technologies Inc LHX | 3.8 % | −43.9 % | 63 |
| Hanwha Aerospace Co Ltd 012450 | 3.7 % | −53.4 % | 39 |
| Thales S.A. HO | 3.7 % | −27.1 % | 64 |
| Leonardo S.p.A. LDO | 3.6 % | −36.6 % | 56 |
| Saab AB (publ) SAAB-B | 3.5 % | −64.4 % | 58 |
| Elbit Systems Ltd ESLT | 2.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| Leidos Holdings Inc LDOS | 2.6 % | +103.2 % | 73 |
| BWX Technologies Inc BWXT | 2.2 % | −72.0 % | 52 |
| Kongsberg Gruppen ASA KOG | 2.1 % | −67.1 % | 68 |
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc HII | 1.7 % | −13.8 % | 58 |
| Moog Inc MOG-A | 1.5 % | −68.0 % | 55 |
| Kratos Defense & Security Solutions KTOS | 1.4 % | −95.6 % | 25 |
| Babcock International Group PLC BAB | 1.0 % | −9.2 % | 52 |
| LIG Nex1 Co Ltd 079550 | 0.9 % | −67.7 % | 44 |
| Korea Aerospace Industries 047810 | 0.9 % | −76.6 % | 39 |
| Hensoldt AG HAG | 0.9 % | −79.3 % | 39 |
| Dassault Aviation SA 0IAX | 0.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| AeroVironment Inc AVAV | 0.8 % | n/a | n/a |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 50 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +65.2 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +56.4 % below FV
- 3 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +52.9 % below FV
- 4 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +44.4 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF +38.3 % below FV
- 6 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +29.9 % below FV
- 7 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +28.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +18.6 % below FV
- 9 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +17.9 % below FV
- 10 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +8.4 % below FV
Frequently asked about SHLD
Is SHLD overvalued?
What is the fair value of SHLD?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of SHLD?
What is the expense ratio of SHLD?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Global X Defense Tech ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 4, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.