Browse all 651 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 185
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
iShares Russell 1000 Growth (IWF)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.19 % · ISIN US4642876142
Price history (since 2000)
Monthly close since 2000. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 15.5 % | −12.0 % | 74 |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 7.7 % | +2.8 % | 82 |
| Alphabet Inc Class A GOOGL | 5.9 % | −1.3 % | 70 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 5.4 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Broadcom Inc AVGO | 4.9 % | −14.6 % | 71 |
| Alphabet Inc Class C GOOG | 4.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 3.8 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Micron Technology Inc MU | 3.6 % | −85.9 % | 74 |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 3.2 % | −88.6 % | 40 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD | 2.9 % | −80.0 % | 75 |
| Eli Lilly and Company LLY | 2.7 % | −31.2 % | 69 |
| Visa Inc. Class A V | 1.8 % | −37.1 % | 82 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 1.3 % | −36.3 % | 83 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR | 1.2 % | −77.6 % | 69 |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 1.1 % | −33.0 % | 86 |
| Applied Materials Inc AMAT | 1.1 % | −22.0 % | 77 |
| Caterpillar Inc CAT | 1.1 % | −62.1 % | 65 |
| GE Aerospace GE | 1.0 % | −71.0 % | 73 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc PANW | 0.9 % | −70.9 % | 57 |
| Netflix Inc NFLX | 0.9 % | +11.2 % | 87 |
| Sandisk Corp SNDK | 0.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| GE Vernova LLC GEV | 0.7 % | −79.6 % | 65 |
| Oracle Corporation ORCL | 0.7 % | −18.5 % | 44 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc CRWD | 0.7 % | −86.6 % | 49 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated TXN | 0.7 % | −69.9 % | 68 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 371 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +87.2 % below FV
- 2 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +57.2 % below FV
- 3 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +43.7 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 5 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +31.4 % below FV
- 6 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +26.0 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.4 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +19.3 % below FV
- 9 ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF +18.3 % below FV
- 10 XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF +17.9 % below FV
Frequently asked about IWF
Is IWF overvalued?
What is the fair value of IWF?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of IWF?
What is the expense ratio of IWF?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 25, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.