Browse all 651 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 185
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock (IXUS)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Global · Expense ratio 0.07 % · ISIN US46432F8344
Price history (since 2012)
Monthly close since 2012. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2330 | 4.4 % | +10.0 % | 72 |
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 005930 | 2.2 % | −42.6 % | 70 |
| SK Hynix Inc 000660 | 1.7 % | +10.0 % | 68 |
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | 1.5 % | −10.2 % | 82 |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd 0700 | 0.8 % | +62.2 % | 70 |
| HSBC Holdings PLC HSBA | 0.8 % | −23.2 % | 58 |
| Roche Holding AG ROP | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| Royal Bank of Canada RY | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| Shell plc SHEL | 0.6 % | −4.6 % | 62 |
| Novartis AG NOVN | 0.6 % | +0.1 % | 85 |
| AstraZeneca PLC AZN | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 9988 | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 8306 | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Nestle S.A. NESN | 0.6 % | −23.7 % | 69 |
| MediaTek Inc 2454 | 0.5 % | −41.0 % | 79 |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft SIE | 0.5 % | −45.3 % | 59 |
| BHP Group Ltd BHP | 0.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| SAP SE SAP | 0.5 % | −13.6 % | 81 |
| Banco Santander S.A. SAN | 0.5 % | −36.0 % | 64 |
| Toronto Dominion Bank TD | 0.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Allianz SE VNA O.N. ALV | 0.4 % | −42.2 % | 63 |
| Schneider Electric S.E. SU | 0.4 % | −56.3 % | 68 |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia CBA | 0.4 % | −54.0 % | 48 |
| Toyota Motor Corp 7203 | 0.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Shopify Inc SHOP | 0.4 % | n/a | n/a |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 4452 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +87.2 % below FV
- 2 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +57.2 % below FV
- 3 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +43.7 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +41.9 % below FV
- 5 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +31.4 % below FV
- 6 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +26.0 % below FV
- 7 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +19.4 % below FV
- 8 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF +19.3 % below FV
- 9 ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF +18.3 % below FV
- 10 XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF +17.9 % below FV
Frequently asked about IXUS
Is IXUS overvalued?
What is the fair value of IXUS?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of IXUS?
What is the expense ratio of IXUS?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 25, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.