HMS Networks AB (publ) vs Cisco Systems: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how HMS Networks AB (publ) (HMS) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: HMS Networks AB (publ) trades at SEK 490 versus a fair value of SEK 191 (-61%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.36 (-29%).
HMS Networks AB (publ)
HMS.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 490
Fair ValueSEK 191
Quality63/100
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$113
Fair Value$80.36
Quality74/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
HMS Networks AB (publ)Cisco Systems
Valuation
43.8×P/E (TTM)40.4×
6.36×P/S (TTM)7.87×
6.97×P/B10.21×
25.5×EV/EBITDA29.0×
0.81×PEG1.68×
1.0%Dividend yield1.4%
SEK 4.80Dividend per share$1.65
Profitability
15%Net margin20%
24%Operating margin25%
16%Return on equity25%
9%Return on assets7%
Growth
18%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
12.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.2%
19.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.8%
Balance & size
0.52×Debt / equity0.49×
$3BMarket cap$478B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
HMS Networks AB (publ) leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
HMS Networks AB (publ)of which business quality 64 · market factors 53Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
50
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
80
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
55
59
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
52
82
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
54
88
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
55
97
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
HMS Networks AB (publ)
DCF ModelsSEK 327
Earnings-BasedSEK 148
MultiplesSEK 169
Asset-BasedSEK 46.40
Growth DCFSEK 297
Economic ProfitSEK 132
Growth EarningsSEK 218
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Cisco Systems
DCF Models$68.44
Earnings-Based$25.45
Dividend Discount$31.20
Multiples$53.39
Asset-Based$7.96
Growth DCF$58.14
Economic Profit$28.50
Growth Earnings$50.63
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
HMS Networks AB (publ)
Bear SEK 143Fair Value SEK 191Bull SEK 238
SEK 490 = current price (white tick)
Cisco Systems
Bear $51.09Fair Value $80.36Bull $102
$113 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
HMS Networks AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%
Cisco Systems · Information Technology
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-29% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: HMS Networks AB (publ) trades at SEK 490 versus a fair value of SEK 191 (-61%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.36 (-29%).
Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
