EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Dick’s Sporting Goods vs Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Dick’s Sporting Goods (DKS) and Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A (ATD) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Dick’s Sporting Goods as the less overvalued of the two: Dick’s Sporting Goods trades at $202 versus a fair value of $181 (-10%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$92.65 versus C$75.00 (-19%).
Dick’s Sporting Goods
DKS · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-10%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$202
Fair Value$181
Quality48/100
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
ATD.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
-19%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$92.65
Fair ValueC$75.00
Quality63/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Dick’s Sporting GoodsAlimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Valuation
20.3×P/E (TTM)19.0×
0.97×P/S (TTM)0.78×
3.37×P/B3.71×
8.7×EV/EBITDA10.7×
1.46×PEG1.52×
2.3%Dividend yield0.7%
$4.89Dividend per shareC$0.61
Profitability
5%Net margin4%
11%Operating margin9%
21%Return on equity20%
7%Return on assets7%
Growth
63%Revenue growth (YoY)-22%
11.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.1%
12.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.8%
Balance & size
0.34×Debt / equity0.64×
$19BMarket cap$60B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Dick’s Sporting Goods leads: 12 to 2 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Dick’s Sporting Goodsof which business quality 50 · market factors 38 Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc Aof which business quality 60 · market factors 73
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
52
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
24
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
40
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
69
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
25
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
49
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
82
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
77
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Dick’s Sporting Goods

DCF Models$195
Earnings-Based$114
Dividend Discount$85.52
Multiples$208
Asset-Based$43.60
Growth DCF$157
Economic Profit$125
Growth Earnings$178

17 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A

DCF ModelsC$84.58
Earnings-BasedC$44.54
Dividend DiscountC$10.60
MultiplesC$66.75
Asset-BasedC$11.80
Growth DCFC$76.25
Economic ProfitC$41.05
Growth EarningsC$70.03

24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Dick’s Sporting Goods
Bear $103Fair Value $181Bull $245
$202 = current price (white tick)
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Bear C$44.15Fair Value C$75.00Bull C$94.14
C$92.65 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Dick’s Sporting Goods · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-10% · below median

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-19% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Dick’s Sporting Goods as the less overvalued of the two: Dick’s Sporting Goods trades at $202 versus a fair value of $181 (-10%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$92.65 versus C$75.00 (-19%).

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A has the higher quality score (63/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.