EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Toast vs Microsoft: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Toast (TOST) and Microsoft (MSFT) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Toast trades at $35.22 versus a fair value of $8.62 (-76%), while Microsoft trades at $497 versus $381 (-23%).
Toast
TOST · USD · Financials
-76%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$35.22
Fair Value$8.62
Quality64/100
Microsoft
MSFT · USD · Information Technology
-23%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$497
Fair Value$381
Quality68/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

ToastMicrosoft
Valuation
43.8×P/E (TTM)22.9×
2.64×P/S (TTM)8.99×
8.01×P/B8.33×
37.7×EV/EBITDA15.6×
0.25×PEG1.19×
Dividend yield0.9%
Dividend per share$3.56
Profitability
6%Net margin39%
7%Operating margin46%
23%Return on equity34%
8%Return on assets15%
Growth
22%Revenue growth (YoY)18%
31.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.4%
49.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.5%
Balance & size
0.08×Debt / equity0.12×
$17BMarket cap$2.9T
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive

Toast leads: 7 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Toastof which business quality 68 · market factors 38 Microsoftof which business quality 65 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
70
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
75
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
71
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
99
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
1
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
17
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
57
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
29
50
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
37
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Toast

DCF Models$26.94
Earnings-Based$27.32
Dividend Discount$20.48
Multiples$7.19
Asset-Based$2.76
Growth DCF$29.51
Economic Profit$5.36

12 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Microsoft

DCF Models$333
Earnings-Based$189
Dividend Discount$61.93
Multiples$308
Asset-Based$30.98
Growth DCF$249
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$332

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Toast
Bear $6.46Fair Value $8.62Bull $10.77
$35.22 = current price (white tick)
Microsoft
Bear $192Fair Value $381Bull $480
$497 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Toast · Financials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-76% · bottom 25%

Microsoft · Information Technology

Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-23% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Toast trades at $35.22 versus a fair value of $8.62 (-76%), while Microsoft trades at $497 versus $381 (-23%).

Microsoft has the higher quality score (68/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.