EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Siteminder vs SAP: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Siteminder (SDR) and SAP (SAP) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SAP as the less overvalued of the two: Siteminder trades at A$3.84 versus a fair value of A$1.04 (-73%), while SAP trades at €180 versus €170 (-6%).
Siteminder
SDR.AU · AUD · Consumer Discretionary
-73%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$3.84
Fair ValueA$1.04
Quality59/100
SAP
SAP.XETRA · EUR · Information Technology
-6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price€180
Fair Value€170
Quality81/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

SiteminderSAP
Valuation
P/E (TTM)22.1×
2.97×P/S (TTM)4.99×
12.92×P/B4.16×
EV/EBITDA15.7×
PEG1.37×
Dividend yield1.8%
Dividend per share€2.50
Profitability
-6%Net margin20%
-3%Operating margin30%
-25%Return on equity16%
-6%Return on assets9%
Growth
25%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
24.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.0%
14.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.09×
$746MMarket cap$186B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

SAP leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Siteminderof which business quality 63 · market factors 26 SAPof which business quality 78 · market factors 42
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
34
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
67
76
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
80
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
88
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
25
61
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
35
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
13
23
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
32
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Siteminder

DCF ModelsA$1.57
MultiplesA$1.08
Asset-BasedA$0.14
Growth DCFA$1.69

11 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

SAP

DCF Models€149
Earnings-Based€60.32
Dividend Discount€41.03
Multiples€147
Asset-Based€25.68
Growth DCF€131
Economic Profit€69.81
Growth Earnings€156

22 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Siteminder
Bear A$0.80Fair Value A$1.04Bull A$1.28
A$3.84 = current price (white tick)
SAP
Bear €104Fair Value €170Bull €220
€180 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Siteminder · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score59 · above median
Fair value upside-73% · bottom 25%

SAP · Information Technology

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SAP as the less overvalued of the two: Siteminder trades at A$3.84 versus a fair value of A$1.04 (-73%), while SAP trades at €180 versus €170 (-6%).

SAP has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.