EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nasdaq vs S&P Global: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nasdaq (NDAQ) and S&P Global (SPGI) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees S&P Global as the less overvalued of the two: Nasdaq trades at $97.59 versus a fair value of $41.12 (-58%), while S&P Global trades at $423 versus $196 (-54%).
Nasdaq
NDAQ · USD · Financials
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$97.59
Fair Value$41.12
Quality61/100
S&P Global
SPGI · USD · Financials
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$423
Fair Value$196
Quality80/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

NasdaqS&P Global
Valuation
29.3×P/E (TTM)28.1×
9.19×P/S (TTM)8.61×
4.07×P/B4.33×
17.9×EV/EBITDA18.6×
2.15×PEG1.85×
1.2%Dividend yield0.9%
$1.08Dividend per share$3.85
Profitability
35%Net margin30%
48%Operating margin44%
16%Return on equity14%
6%Return on assets7%
Growth
14%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
9.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.1%
7.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)15.6%
Balance & size
0.70×Debt / equity0.40×
$50BMarket cap$135B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 7 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nasdaqof which business quality 58 · market factors 59 S&P Globalof which business quality 74 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
45
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
77
59
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
82
88
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
46
66
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
41
100
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
67
60
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
52
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
61
23
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
58
99

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nasdaq

DCF Models$40.47
Earnings-Based$55.17
Dividend Discount$18.70
Multiples$35.70
Asset-Based$14.49
Growth DCF$42.31
Economic Profit$27.71

13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

S&P Global

DCF Models$217
Earnings-Based$214
Dividend Discount$68.00
Multiples$172
Asset-Based$70.70
Growth DCF$208
Economic Profit$133

13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nasdaq
Bear $21.51Fair Value $41.12Bull $63.00
$97.59 = current price (white tick)
S&P Global
Bear $135Fair Value $196Bull $300
$423 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nasdaq · Financials

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-58% · bottom 25%

S&P Global · Financials

Quality score80 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees S&P Global as the less overvalued of the two: Nasdaq trades at $97.59 versus a fair value of $41.12 (-58%), while S&P Global trades at $423 versus $196 (-54%).

S&P Global has the higher quality score (80/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.