Lotte Shopping vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lotte Shopping (023530) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Lotte Shopping trades at KRW 102,900 versus a fair value of KRW 76,636 (-26%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,245 versus CLP 8,005 (+28%).
Lotte Shopping
023530.KO · KRW · Consumer Discretionary
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 102,900
Fair ValueKRW 76,636
Quality46/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+28%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,245
Fair ValueCLP 8,005
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Lotte ShoppingFalabella S.A
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)11.2×
—P/S (TTM)1.11×
—P/B1.88×
2.8×EV/EBITDA7.4×
—PEG1.03×
2.6%Dividend yield—
KRW 4,000Dividend per share—
Profitability
1%Net margin10%
7%Operating margin13%
1%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
4%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-3.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
-3.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.35×Debt / equity0.06×
$3BMarket cap$16B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Falabella S.A leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Lotte Shoppingof which business quality 46 · market factors 60Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 65
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
20
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
56
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
69
53
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
54
70
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Lotte Shopping
DCF ModelsKRW 170,628
Earnings-BasedKRW 27,254
Dividend DiscountKRW 78,666
MultiplesKRW 63,069
Asset-BasedKRW 359,877
Growth DCFKRW 272,131
Economic ProfitKRW 191,003
Growth EarningsKRW 30,302
13 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Falabella S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208
4 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Lotte Shopping
Bear KRW 69,337Fair Value KRW 76,636Bull KRW 87,956
KRW 102,900 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,604Fair Value CLP 8,005Bull CLP 11,780
CLP 6,245 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Lotte Shopping · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside-26% · below median
Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+28% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Lotte Shopping trades at KRW 102,900 versus a fair value of KRW 76,636 (-26%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,245 versus CLP 8,005 (+28%).
Falabella S.A has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
