Is GEM Co or Waste Management more undervalued?

As of Sep 5, 2026, GEM Co is at -18% to fair value and Waste Management at -42%. GEM Co is the less overvalued of the two. Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

Which has higher quality, GEM Co or Waste Management?

GEM Co has a quality score of 42/100 and Waste Management 56/100. Waste Management leads on quality.

STOCK COMPARISON

GEM Co vs Waste Management: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how GEM Co (002340) and Waste Management (WM) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GEM Co as the less overvalued of the two: GEM Co trades at ¥6.46 versus a fair value of ¥5.27 (-18%), while Waste Management trades at $222 versus $128 (-42%).

GEM Co

002340.SHE · CNY · Materials

-18%

upside to fair value

overvalued

Price¥6.46

Fair Value¥5.27

Quality42/100

Waste Management

WM · USD · Industrials

-42%

upside to fair value

overvalued

Price$222

Fair Value$128

Quality56/100

Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

GEM CoWaste Management

Valuation

20.8×P/E (TTM)33.8×

1.04×P/S (TTM)3.69×

1.82×P/B9.38×

7.6×EV/EBITDA15.1×

0.93×PEG2.38×

−18.4%Fair value upside−42.3%

1.5%Dividend yield1.5%

¥0.10Dividend per share$3.42

Profitability

12%Operating margin18%

1.95×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.12×

7%Return on equity30%

3%Return on assets7%

Growth

5%Revenue growth (YoY)4%

8.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.6%

24.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.6%

+12.9%Value creation/yr+13.7%

Balance & size

3.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.1×

0.69×Debt / equity2.22×

$6BMarket cap$94B

expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Waste Management leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

GEM Coof which business quality 41 · market factors 32 Waste Managementof which business quality 54 · market factors 56

ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today

Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?

CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit

Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk

InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building

Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)

MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)

52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)

Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model family	GEM CoPrice ¥6.46	Waste ManagementPrice $222
DCF Models	n/a	-51%below the price$108
Earnings-Based	+38%above the price¥8.90	-64%below the price$80.38
Dividend Discount	-31%below the price¥4.48	n/a
Multiples	-11%close to the price¥5.77	-43%below the price$127
Asset-Based	-57%below the price¥2.81	-92%below the price$16.67
Growth DCF	n/a	-57%below the price$95.15
Economic Profit	-34%below the price¥4.24	-68%below the price$71.06
Growth Earnings	+59%above the price¥10.26	-42%below the price$128
Minimum	-57%below the price¥2.81	-92%below the price$16.67
Maximum	+59%above the price¥10.26	-42%below the price$128
Median	-21%below the price¥5.13	-57%below the price$95.15
Geometric mean	-15%close to the price¥5.51	-65%below the price$76.95

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

GEM Co: 10 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Waste Management: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

GEM Co

Bear ¥3.95Fair Value ¥5.27Bull ¥6.58

¥6.46 = current price (white tick)

Waste Management

Bear $50.10Fair Value $128Bull $177

$222 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

First stock

Second stock

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

GEM Co · Materials

Quality score42 · below median

Fair value upside-18% · above median

Waste Management · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median

Fair value upside-42% · below median

Bottom line

Waste Management has the higher quality score (56/100).

See the full analysis →

GEM Co · Waste Management

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to GEM Co

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon Communications Alphabet Inc Class C vs At&t Alphabet Inc Class C vs NetEase Amazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Waste Management

Amazon.com vs Sony Group Meta Platforms vs Verizon Communications Meta Platforms vs At&t Meta Platforms vs NetEase

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.