EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China International Marine Containers Group vs Carpenter Technology: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China International Marine Containers Group (000039) and Carpenter Technology (CRS) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China International Marine Containers Group as the less overvalued of the two: China International Marine Containers Group trades at ¥8.80 versus a fair value of ¥5.76 (-35%), while Carpenter Technology trades at $536 versus $101 (-81%).
China International Marine Containers Group
000039.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-35%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥8.80
Fair Value¥5.76
Quality38/100
Carpenter Technology
CRS · USD · Materials
-81%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$536
Fair Value$101
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China International Marine Containers GroupCarpenter Technology
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)60.6×
0.05×P/S (TTM)9.47×
0.16×P/B15.20×
—EV/EBITDA37.9×
4.98×PEG1.59×
2.0%Dividend yield0.1%
¥0.18Dividend per share$0.80
Profitability
-0%Net margin16%
3%Operating margin23%
2%Return on equity25%
2%Return on assets11%
Growth
-9%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
3.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.1%
10.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.7%
Balance & size
0.46×Debt / equity0.37×
$7BMarket cap$29B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Carpenter Technology leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China International Marine Containers Groupof which business quality 41 · market factors 32 Carpenter Technologyof which business quality 63 · market factors 74
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
59
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
75
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
51
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
38
68
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
90
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
49
36
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
19
91
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
34
89
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
70

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China International Marine Containers Group

DCF Models¥69.59
Earnings-Based¥2.36
Dividend Discount¥7.19
Multiples¥9.72
Asset-Based¥13.48
Growth DCF¥99.75
Economic Profit¥10.46
Growth Earnings¥1.98

11 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Carpenter Technology

DCF Models$109
Earnings-Based$68.04
Dividend Discount$13.82
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$25.45
Growth DCF$88.87
Economic Profit$86.83
Growth Earnings$116

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China International Marine Containers Group
Bear ¥2.57Fair Value ¥5.76Bull ¥7.96
¥8.80 = current price (white tick)
Carpenter Technology
Bear $61.80Fair Value $101Bull $150
$536 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China International Marine Containers Group · Industrials

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-35% · below median

Carpenter Technology · Materials

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-81% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China International Marine Containers Group as the less overvalued of the two: China International Marine Containers Group trades at ¥8.80 versus a fair value of ¥5.76 (-35%), while Carpenter Technology trades at $536 versus $101 (-81%).

Carpenter Technology has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →
China International Marine Containers Group · Carpenter Technology

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China International Marine Containers Group

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Carpenter Technology

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.