EN DE

Stock Market Valuation Statistics › Sectors

Consumer Cyclical Stock Valuation

How expensive are Consumer Cyclical stocks compared with fair value? This figure comes from our valuation of 35,000+ stocks and updates monthly. Free to cite with attribution.

As of: 2026-09-01 · September 2026 · updated monthly

Consumer Cyclical vs. fair value
+17.4 %
above aggregate fair value
Rank
#10 / 11
by valuation, most expensive first
vs. global market
+34.6 %
Consumer Cyclical is cheaper

Consumer Cyclical stocks currently trade +17.4 % above their estimated fair value, ranking 10 of 11 sectors we track. That is cheaper than the global market (+34.6 %).

All sectors compared

#Sector% above fair value
1 Information Technology +71.7 %
2 Materials +43.0 %
3 Industrials +41.8 %
4 Communication Services +41.3 %
5 Energy +37.1 %
6 Health Care +36.4 %
7 Utilities +34.1 %
8 Real Estate +28.8 %
9 Consumer Staples +28.7 %
10 Consumer Discretionary +17.4 %
11 Financials +5.5 %

Most undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks

Names with the largest upside to fair value at solid quality:

CompanyUpsideQuality
Lojas Renner S.A.+194.2 %74/100
PDD Holdings Inc.+174.1 %66/100
F&F Co Ltd+170.7 %70/100
Youngone+149.7 %64/100
Lululemon Athletica Inc.+149.5 %70/100
MGM China Holdings Ltd+142.3 %79/100
JD Sports Fashion PLC+142.0 %64/100
Versigent PLC+131.9 %63/100
Harley-Davidson Inc+130.5 %63/100
Tongcheng-Elong Holdings Ltd+129.5 %63/100
Pinduoduo Inc.+125.6 %67/100
Gree Electric Appliances Inc of Zhuhai+124.3 %65/100

See all undervalued stocks →

Cite or reuse this figure

Suggested citation: Fair Value Calculator, Stock Market Valuation Statistics (September 2026). https://www.fairvalue-calculator.com/stock-market-valuation-statistics/sector/consumer-discretionary

Free to use under CC BY 4.0. Raw data as CSV/JSON and code samples: /developers

Methodology: fair value per stock from 26 independent valuation models, quality from 37 fundamental factors, backed by a 34-year backtest. "% above fair value" = capitalisation-weighted gap of price to the aggregate fair value of the group. For information, not investment advice.