EN DE

Stock Market Valuation Statistics › Sectors

Basic Materials Stock Valuation

How expensive are Basic Materials stocks compared with fair value? This figure comes from our valuation of 35,000+ stocks and updates monthly. Free to cite with attribution.

As of: 2026-09-01 · September 2026 · updated monthly

Basic Materials vs. fair value
+43.0 %
above aggregate fair value
Rank
#2 / 11
by valuation, most expensive first
vs. global market
+34.6 %
Basic Materials is more expensive

more than 10% below fair value (cheap)near fair value (±10%)more than 10% above fair value (expensive)

Basic Materials stocks currently trade +43.0 % above their estimated fair value, ranking 2 of 11 sectors we track. That is more expensive than the global market (+34.6 %).

All sectors compared

#Sector% above fair value
1 Information Technology +71.7 %
2 Materials +43.0 %
3 Industrials +41.8 %
4 Communication Services +41.3 %
5 Energy +37.1 %
6 Health Care +36.4 %
7 Utilities +34.1 %
8 Real Estate +28.8 %
9 Consumer Staples +28.7 %
10 Consumer Discretionary +17.4 %
11 Financials +5.5 %

Most undervalued Basic Materials stocks

Names with the largest upside to fair value at solid quality:

CompanyUpsideQuality
Fortescue Ltd +190.0 % 63/100
Kumho Petro Chemical +84.3 % 61/100
Pilbara Minerals Ltd +68.8 % 73/100
Endeavour Mining Corp +60.8 % 87/100
Ingevity Corp +60.0 % 64/100
Novonesis (Novozymes) A/S +60.0 % 62/100
China Hongqiao Group Ltd +44.4 % 62/100
Lundin Gold Inc +40.2 % 85/100
Perseus Mining Ltd +38.5 % 70/100
Buzzi Unicem S.p.A. +33.7 % 63/100
Gansu Shangfeng Cement Co Ltd +33.6 % 61/100
CF Industries Holdings Inc +33.5 % 81/100

See all undervalued stocks →

Cite or reuse this figure

Suggested citation: Fair Value Calculator, Stock Market Valuation Statistics (September 2026). https://www.fairvalue-calculator.com/stock-market-valuation-statistics/sector/materials

Free to use under CC BY 4.0. Raw data as CSV/JSON and code samples: /developers

Methodology: fair value per stock from 26 independent valuation models, quality from 37 fundamental factors, backed by a 34-year backtest. "% above fair value" = capitalisation-weighted gap of price to the aggregate fair value of the group. For information, not investment advice.