EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Woodward vs GE Aerospace: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Woodward (WWD) and GE Aerospace (GE) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Woodward as the less overvalued of the two: Woodward trades at $359 versus a fair value of $123 (-66%), while GE Aerospace trades at $361 versus $117 (-68%).
Woodward
WWD · USD · Industrials
-66%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$359
Fair Value$123
Quality67/100
GE Aerospace
GE · USD · Industrials
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$361
Fair Value$117
Quality73/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

WoodwardGE Aerospace
Valuation
47.7×P/E (TTM)43.8×
5.93×P/S (TTM)7.65×
9.24×P/B19.79×
33.0×EV/EBITDA34.1×
2.52×PEG8.51×
0.3%Dividend yield0.4%
$1.16Dividend per share$1.55
Profitability
13%Net margin18%
15%Operating margin20%
21%Return on equity45%
8%Return on assets5%
Growth
23%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
14.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-15.7%
7.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-9.6%
Balance & size
0.18×Debt / equity1.01×
$24BMarket cap$370B
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Woodward leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Woodwardof which business quality 64 · market factors 61 GE Aerospaceof which business quality 67 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
55
54
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
57
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
50
63
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
73
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
68
99
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
48
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
56
67
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
69
75
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
91
96

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Woodward

DCF Models$126
Earnings-Based$66.68
Multiples$130
Asset-Based$28.86
Growth DCF$106
Economic Profit$78.51
Growth Earnings$142

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

GE Aerospace

DCF Models$102
Earnings-Based$73.12
Dividend Discount$15.91
Multiples$103
Asset-Based$11.99
Growth DCF$88.60
Economic Profit$108
Growth Earnings$133

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Woodward
Bear $74.55Fair Value $123Bull $164
$359 = current price (white tick)
GE Aerospace
Bear $70.76Fair Value $117Bull $148
$361 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Woodward · Industrials

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-66% · bottom 25%

GE Aerospace · Industrials

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Woodward as the less overvalued of the two: Woodward trades at $359 versus a fair value of $123 (-66%), while GE Aerospace trades at $361 versus $117 (-68%).

GE Aerospace has the higher quality score (73/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.