Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Willis Towers Watson: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Willis Towers Watson leads: 7 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Marsh & McLennan CompaniesPrice $188 | Willis Towers WatsonPrice $342 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Discount | ▼-68%below the price$60.10 | ▼-81%below the price$64.91 |
| Multiples | ▼-59%below the price$78.07 | ▼-50%below the price$170 |
| Asset-Based | ▼-89%below the price$21.00 | ▼-83%below the price$56.58 |
| Economic Profit | ▼-61%below the price$74.16 | ▼-56%below the price$151 |
| Minimum | ▼-89%below the price$21.00 | ▼-83%below the price$56.58 |
| Maximum | ▼-59%below the price$78.07 | ▼-50%below the price$170 |
| Median | ▼-64%below the price$67.13 | ▼-68%below the price$108 |
| Geometric mean | ▼-72%below the price$51.99 | ▼-71%below the price$98.43 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Marsh & McLennan Companies: 6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.
Willis Towers Watson: 6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Marsh & McLennan Companies · Financials
Willis Towers Watson · Financials
Bottom line
As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Willis Towers Watson as the less overvalued of the two: Marsh & McLennan Companies trades at $188 versus a fair value of $112 (-40%), while Willis Towers Watson trades at $342 versus $221 (-35%).
Willis Towers Watson has the higher quality score (70/100).
See the full analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to Marsh & McLennan Companies
Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsRelated to Willis Towers Watson
Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEaseSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.