EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

FactSet Research Systems vs S&P Global: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how FactSet Research Systems (FDS) and S&P Global (SPGI) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees FactSet Research Systems as the less overvalued of the two: FactSet Research Systems trades at $313 versus a fair value of $218 (-30%), while S&P Global trades at $451 versus $196 (-56%).
FactSet Research Systems
FDS · USD · Financials
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$313
Fair Value$218
Quality72/100
S&P Global
SPGI · USD · Financials
-56%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$451
Fair Value$196
Quality80/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

FactSet Research SystemsS&P Global
Valuation
17.3×P/E (TTM)28.1×
3.68×P/S (TTM)8.61×
4.11×P/B4.33×
10.7×EV/EBITDA18.6×
1.21×PEG1.85×
−30.3%Fair value upside−56.4%
1.4%Dividend yield0.9%
$4.40Dividend per share$3.85
Profitability
31%Operating margin44%
1.10×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.87×
27%Return on equity14%
11%Return on assets7%
Growth
6%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
8.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.1%
9.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)15.6%
+9.1%Value creation/yr+8.4%
Balance & size
13.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)22.6×
0.63×Debt / equity0.40×
$9BMarket cap$135B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

FactSet Research Systems leads: 10 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

FactSet Research Systemsof which business quality 69 · market factors 51 S&P Globalof which business quality 74 · market factors 45
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
72
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
49
59
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
83
88
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
61
66
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
61
100
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
56
59
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
56
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
35
35
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
86
99

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyFactSet Research SystemsPrice $313S&P GlobalPrice $451
DCF Models-21%below the price$248-52%below the price$217
Earnings-Based+2%close to the price$319-52%below the price$214
Dividend Discount-77%below the price$73.37-85%below the price$68.00
Multiples-51%below the price$152-62%below the price$172
Asset-Based-87%below the price$41.19-84%below the price$70.70
Growth DCF-25%below the price$236-54%below the price$208
Economic Profit-51%below the price$152-70%below the price$133
Minimum-87%below the price$41.19-85%below the price$68.00
Maximum+2%close to the price$319-52%below the price$217
Median-51%below the price$152-62%below the price$172
Geometric mean-54%below the price$144-69%below the price$140

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

FactSet Research Systems: 11 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

S&P Global: 13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

FactSet Research Systems
Bear $154Fair Value $218Bull $394
$313 = current price (white tick)
S&P Global
Bear $135Fair Value $196Bull $300
$451 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

FactSet Research Systems · Financials

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-30% · below median

S&P Global · Financials

Quality score80 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-56% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees FactSet Research Systems as the less overvalued of the two: FactSet Research Systems trades at $313 versus a fair value of $218 (-30%), while S&P Global trades at $451 versus $196 (-56%).

S&P Global has the higher quality score (80/100).

See the full analysis →
FactSet Research Systems · S&P Global

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to FactSet Research Systems

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to S&P Global

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.