EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cintas vs Global Payments: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cintas (CTAS) and Global Payments (GPN) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Global Payments as the less overvalued of the two: Cintas trades at $201 versus a fair value of $95.19 (-53%), while Global Payments trades at $91.77 versus $68.98 (-25%).
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$201
Fair Value$95.19
Quality78/100
Global Payments
GPN · USD · Financials
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$91.77
Fair Value$68.98
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

CintasGlobal Payments
Valuation
42.0×P/E (TTM)29.6×
7.33×P/S (TTM)2.49×
16.06×P/B0.96×
27.0×EV/EBITDA8.5×
3.06×PEG0.22×
−52.7%Fair value upside−24.8%
0.9%Dividend yield1.1%
$1.74Dividend per share$1.00
Profitability
24%Operating margin13%
1.18×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.16×
41%Return on equity3%
16%Return on assets2%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)63%
8.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-5.0%
9.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.7%
+14.7%Value creation/yr+17.7%
Balance & size
24.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)2.3×
0.47×Debt / equity0.85×
$83BMarket cap$22B
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Cintas leads: 8 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 54 Global Paymentsof which business quality 62 · market factors 65
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
91
32
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
53
41
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
67
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
45
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
71
78
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
74
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
44
64
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
47
71
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
90
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyCintasPrice $201Global PaymentsPrice $91.77
DCF Models-52%below the price$96.89-27%below the price$66.82
Earnings-Based-76%below the price$48.67+11%close to the price$102
Dividend Discount-85%below the price$30.85-83%below the price$15.35
Multiples-62%below the price$76.91-16%below the price$76.78
Asset-Based-96%below the price$8.61-39%below the price$56.06
Growth DCF-63%below the price$74.33-10%close to the price$82.82
Economic Profit-71%below the price$58.94-26%below the price$68.03
Growth Earnings-60%below the price$81.35n/a
Minimum-96%below the price$8.61-83%below the price$15.35
Maximum-52%below the price$96.89+11%close to the price$102
Median-67%below the price$66.63-26%below the price$68.03
Geometric mean-76%below the price$49.20-36%below the price$59.18

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Cintas: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Global Payments: 10 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Cintas
Bear $55.52Fair Value $95.19Bull $121
$201 = current price (white tick)
Global Payments
Bear $49.90Fair Value $68.98Bull $83.17
$91.77 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-53% · below median

Global Payments · Financials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Global Payments as the less overvalued of the two: Cintas trades at $201 versus a fair value of $95.19 (-53%), while Global Payments trades at $91.77 versus $68.98 (-25%).

Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).

See the full analysis →
Cintas · Global Payments

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Cintas

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Global Payments

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.