EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A vs Williams-Sonoma: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A (ATD) and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$81.91 versus a fair value of C$104 (+27%), while Williams-Sonoma trades at $223 versus $163 (-27%).
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
ATD.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
+27%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceC$81.91
Fair ValueC$104
Quality63/100
Williams-Sonoma
WSM · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-27%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$223
Fair Value$163
Quality78/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc AWilliams-Sonoma
Valuation
19.0×P/E (TTM)25.7×
0.79×P/S (TTM)3.42×
3.73×P/B12.95×
10.8×EV/EBITDA15.7×
1.52×PEG2.85×
+27.4%Fair value upside−27.0%
1.0%Dividend yield1.2%
C$0.82Dividend per share$2.74
Profitability
9%Operating margin16%
0.75×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.35×
20%Return on equity54%
7%Return on assets17%
Growth
-22%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
2.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.5%
10.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.9%
+7.6%Value creation/yr+16.7%
Balance & size
6.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)48.5×
0.64×Debt / equity
$60BMarket cap$27B
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A leads: 9 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc Aof which business quality 60 · market factors 58 Williams-Sonomaof which business quality 76 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
62
92
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
40
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
48
62
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
57
82
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
77
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
79
42
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
49
60
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
50
62
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAlimentation Couchen Tard Inc APrice C$81.91Williams-SonomaPrice $223
DCF Models+3%close to the priceC$84.58-20%below the price$178
Earnings-Based-46%below the priceC$44.54-60%below the price$89.58
Dividend Discount-87%below the priceC$10.60n/a
Multiples-19%below the priceC$66.75-41%below the price$132
Asset-Based-86%below the priceC$11.80-95%below the price$11.85
Growth DCF-7%close to the priceC$76.25-36%below the price$143
Economic Profit-50%below the priceC$41.05-45%below the price$123
Growth Earnings-15%close to the priceC$70.03-17%below the price$186
Minimum-87%below the priceC$10.60-95%below the price$11.85
Maximum+3%close to the priceC$84.58-17%below the price$186
Median-32%below the priceC$55.65-41%below the price$132
Geometric mean-51%below the priceC$40.25-56%below the price$97.18

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: 19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Williams-Sonoma: 23 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Bear C$61.16Fair Value C$104Bull C$130
C$81.91 = current price (white tick)
Williams-Sonoma
Bear $107Fair Value $163Bull $206
$223 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+27% · above median

Williams-Sonoma · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-27% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$81.91 versus a fair value of C$104 (+27%), while Williams-Sonoma trades at $223 versus $163 (-27%).

Williams-Sonoma has the higher quality score (78/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.