China CSSC Holdings vs GE Aerospace: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China CSSC Holdings (600150) and GE Aerospace (GE) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China CSSC Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: China CSSC Holdings trades at ¥33.78 versus a fair value of ¥18.62 (-45%), while GE Aerospace trades at $361 versus $117 (-68%).
China CSSC Holdings
600150.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-45%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥33.78
Fair Value¥18.62
Quality34/100
GE Aerospace
GE · USD · Industrials
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$361
Fair Value$117
Quality73/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
China CSSC HoldingsGE Aerospace
Valuation
20.8×P/E (TTM)43.8×
1.54×P/S (TTM)7.65×
1.80×P/B19.79×
9.3×EV/EBITDA34.1×
—PEG8.51×
1.0%Dividend yield0.4%
¥0.37Dividend per share$1.55
Profitability
7%Net margin18%
11%Operating margin20%
13%Return on equity45%
2%Return on assets5%
Growth
55%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
36.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-15.7%
22.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-9.6%
Balance & size
0.10×Debt / equity1.01×
$38BMarket cap$370B
healthyGrowth qualityweak
China CSSC Holdings leads: 9 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
China CSSC Holdingsof which business quality 36 · market factors 41GE Aerospaceof which business quality 67 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
23
54
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
56
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
99
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
65
48
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
32
67
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
27
75
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
96
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
China CSSC Holdings
DCF Models¥45.11
Earnings-Based¥25.22
Dividend Discount¥4.67
Multiples¥25.76
Asset-Based¥12.77
Growth DCF¥36.54
Economic Profit¥23.25
Growth Earnings¥30.63
14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
GE Aerospace
DCF Models$102
Earnings-Based$73.12
Dividend Discount$15.91
Multiples$103
Asset-Based$11.99
Growth DCF$88.60
Economic Profit$108
Growth Earnings$133
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
China CSSC Holdings
Bear ¥13.97Fair Value ¥18.62Bull ¥22.62
¥33.78 = current price (white tick)
GE Aerospace
Bear $70.76Fair Value $117Bull $148
$361 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
China CSSC Holdings · Industrials
Quality score34 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-45% · below median
GE Aerospace · Industrials
Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China CSSC Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: China CSSC Holdings trades at ¥33.78 versus a fair value of ¥18.62 (-45%), while GE Aerospace trades at $361 versus $117 (-68%).
GE Aerospace has the higher quality score (73/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
