Shenzhou International Group Holdings vs Albany International: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) and Albany International (AIN) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 7 to 1 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Shenzhou International Group HoldingsPrice HK$37.16 | Albany InternationalPrice $62.59 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▲+90%above the priceHK$70.68 | ▼-65%below the price$21.62 |
| Earnings-Based | ▲+22%above the priceHK$45.41 | n/a |
| Dividend Discount | ▲+16%above the priceHK$43.01 | ▼-80%below the price$12.49 |
| Multiples | ▲+81%above the priceHK$67.20 | ▼-65%below the price$22.09 |
| Asset-Based | ▼-55%below the priceHK$16.72 | ▼-73%below the price$17.16 |
| Growth DCF | ▲+26%above the priceHK$46.79 | ▼-63%below the price$23.22 |
| Economic Profit | ▲+21%above the priceHK$44.98 | n/a |
| Growth Earnings | ▲+98%above the priceHK$73.43 | n/a |
| Minimum | ▼-55%below the priceHK$16.72 | ▼-80%below the price$12.49 |
| Maximum | ▲+98%above the priceHK$73.43 | ▼-63%below the price$23.22 |
| Median | ▲+24%above the priceHK$46.10 | ▼-65%below the price$21.62 |
| Geometric mean | ▲+27%above the priceHK$47.04 | ▼-70%below the price$18.84 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Shenzhou International Group Holdings: 4 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Albany International: 12 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary
Albany International · Industrials
Bottom line
As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$37.16 versus a fair value of HK$68.35 (+84%), while Albany International trades at $62.59 versus $18.40 (-71%).
Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).
See the full analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupPDD Holdings vs TeslaSony Group vs TeslaSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.