EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Schlumberger vs Subsea 7 S.A.: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Schlumberger (SLB) and Subsea 7 S.A. (SUBC) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Subsea 7 S.A. as the less overvalued of the two: Schlumberger trades at $57.41 versus a fair value of $28.66 (-50%), while Subsea 7 S.A. trades at NOK 326 versus NOK 221 (-32%).
Schlumberger
SLB · USD · Energy
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$57.41
Fair Value$28.66
Quality52/100
Subsea 7 S.A.
SUBC.OL · NOK · Energy
-32%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 326
Fair ValueNOK 221
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

SchlumbergerSubsea 7 S.A.
Valuation
20.7×P/E (TTM)18.9×
1.96×P/S (TTM)1.37×
2.69×P/B2.28×
10.3×EV/EBITDA7.2×
1.62×PEG0.12×
−50.1%Fair value upside−32.2%
2.0%Dividend yield4.0%
$1.15Dividend per shareNOK 13.00
Profitability
12%Operating margin11%
14%Return on equity11%
6%Return on assets7%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
8.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.3%
8.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)15.4%
+15.9%Value creation/yr+71.1%
Balance & size
9.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)21.3×
0.37×Debt / equity0.09×
$70BMarket cap$10B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed

Subsea 7 S.A. leads: 1 to 13 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Schlumbergerof which business quality 54 · market factors 76 Subsea 7 S.A.of which business quality 72 · market factors 81
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
41
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
18
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
72
81
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
67
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
58
84
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
68
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
68
76
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
98
91
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
58
86

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familySchlumbergerPrice $57.41Subsea 7 S.A.Price NOK 326
DCF Models-37%below the price$35.98-86%below the priceNOK 47.00
Earnings-Based-62%below the price$21.58-95%below the priceNOK 17.61
Dividend Discount-68%below the price$18.13-93%below the priceNOK 22.04
Multiples-48%below the price$30.02-92%below the priceNOK 25.79
Asset-Based-80%below the price$11.70-97%below the priceNOK 9.97
Growth DCF-29%below the price$40.81-82%below the priceNOK 58.49
Economic Profit-52%below the price$27.29-93%below the priceNOK 21.77
Growth Earnings-50%below the price$28.48-94%below the priceNOK 18.60
Minimum-80%below the price$11.70-97%below the priceNOK 9.97
Maximum-29%below the price$40.81-82%below the priceNOK 58.49
Median-51%below the price$27.88-93%below the priceNOK 21.90
Geometric mean-56%below the price$25.08-93%below the priceNOK 24.03

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Schlumberger: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Subsea 7 S.A.: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Schlumberger
Bear $21.17Fair Value $28.66Bull $36.48
$57.41 = current price (white tick)
Subsea 7 S.A.
Bear NOK 166Fair Value NOK 221Bull NOK 277
NOK 326 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Schlumberger · Energy

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Subsea 7 S.A. · Energy

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-32% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Subsea 7 S.A. as the less overvalued of the two: Schlumberger trades at $57.41 versus a fair value of $28.66 (-50%), while Subsea 7 S.A. trades at NOK 326 versus NOK 221 (-32%).

Subsea 7 S.A. has the higher quality score (72/100).

See the full analysis →
Schlumberger · Subsea 7 S.A.

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Schlumberger

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Subsea 7 S.A.

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.