Crowdstrike Holdings vs Microsoft: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Crowdstrike Holdings (CRWD) and Microsoft (MSFT) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Crowdstrike Holdings trades at $226 versus a fair value of $21.06 (-91%), while Microsoft trades at $497 versus $381 (-23%).
Crowdstrike Holdings
CRWD · USD · Information Technology
-91%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$226
Fair Value$21.06
Quality49/100
Microsoft
MSFT · USD · Information Technology
-23%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$497
Fair Value$381
Quality68/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Crowdstrike HoldingsMicrosoft
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)22.9×
37.42×P/S (TTM)8.99×
43.04×P/B8.33×
—EV/EBITDA15.6×
6.09×PEG1.19×
—Dividend yield0.9%
—Dividend per share$3.56
Profitability
-1%Net margin39%
-2%Operating margin46%
-0%Return on equity34%
-1%Return on assets15%
Growth
26%Revenue growth (YoY)18%
29.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.4%
40.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.5%
Balance & size
0.17×Debt / equity0.12×
$191BMarket cap$2.9T
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
Microsoft leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Crowdstrike Holdingsof which business quality 55 · market factors 81Microsoftof which business quality 65 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
25
1
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
35
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
50
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
37
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Crowdstrike Holdings
DCF Models$38.48
Dividend Discount$0.87
Multiples$21.13
Asset-Based$2.91
Growth DCF$39.58
9 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.
Microsoft
DCF Models$333
Earnings-Based$189
Dividend Discount$61.93
Multiples$308
Asset-Based$30.98
Growth DCF$249
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$332
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Crowdstrike Holdings
Bear $16.04Fair Value $21.06Bull $26.08
$226 = current price (white tick)
Microsoft
Bear $192Fair Value $381Bull $480
$497 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Crowdstrike Holdings · Information Technology
Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-91% · bottom 25%
Microsoft · Information Technology
Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-23% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Crowdstrike Holdings trades at $226 versus a fair value of $21.06 (-91%), while Microsoft trades at $497 versus $381 (-23%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
