Schibsted ASA vs Alphabet Inc Class C: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Schibsted ASA (SBSNY) and Alphabet Inc Class C (GOOG) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alphabet Inc Class C as the less overvalued of the two: Schibsted ASA trades at $24.70 versus a fair value of $9.10 (-63%), while Alphabet Inc Class C trades at $344 versus $145 (-58%).
Schibsted ASA
SBSNY · USD · Communication Services
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$24.70
Fair Value$9.10
Quality55/100
Alphabet Inc Class C
GOOG · USD · Communication Services
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$344
Fair Value$145
Quality70/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Schibsted ASAAlphabet Inc Class C
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)26.4×
0.83×P/S (TTM)10.00×
0.21×P/B10.17×
2.6×EV/EBITDA26.3×
—PEG1.36×
1.1%Dividend yield0.2%
$2.50Dividend per share$0.84
Profitability
-42%Net margin38%
26%Operating margin36%
-17%Return on equity39%
4%Return on assets15%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)22%
-26.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.5%
-13.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.2%
Balance & size
0.08×Debt / equity0.11×
$5BMarket cap$4.2T
weakGrowth qualityexpensive
Alphabet Inc Class C leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Schibsted ASAof which business quality 54 · market factors 26Alphabet Inc Class Cof which business quality 69 · market factors 65
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
11
84
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
9
56
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
87
8
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
40
52
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
61
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
11
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
99
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Schibsted ASA
DCF Models$85.21
Earnings-Based$66.69
Dividend Discount$48.42
Multiples$121
Asset-Based$79.59
Growth DCF$82.37
Economic Profit$66.69
0 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
Alphabet Inc Class C
DCF Models$200
Earnings-Based$260
Dividend Discount$15.70
Multiples$133
Asset-Based$22.75
Growth DCF$181
Economic Profit$155
Growth Earnings$343
23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Schibsted ASA
Bear $6.30Fair Value $9.10Bull $12.74
$24.70 = current price (white tick)
Alphabet Inc Class C
Bear $105Fair Value $145Bull $373
$344 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Schibsted ASA · Communication Services
Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-63% · bottom 25%
Alphabet Inc Class C · Communication Services
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-58% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alphabet Inc Class C as the less overvalued of the two: Schibsted ASA trades at $24.70 versus a fair value of $9.10 (-63%), while Alphabet Inc Class C trades at $344 versus $145 (-58%).
Alphabet Inc Class C has the higher quality score (70/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
