EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

EssilorLuxottica S. A. vs Kimberly-Clark: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how EssilorLuxottica S. A. (EL) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Kimberly-Clark as the less overvalued of the two: EssilorLuxottica S. A. trades at €150 versus a fair value of €94.93 (-37%), while Kimberly-Clark trades at $108 versus $79.71 (-26%).
EssilorLuxottica S. A.
EL.PA · EUR · Health Care
-37%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€150
Fair Value€94.93
Quality63/100
Kimberly-Clark
KMB · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$108
Fair Value$79.71
Quality56/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

EssilorLuxottica S. A.Kimberly-Clark
Valuation
29.4×P/E (TTM)21.1×
3.21×P/S (TTM)2.19×
2.35×P/B24.09×
17.0×EV/EBITDA12.5×
1.65×PEG2.15×
−36.6%Fair value upside−26.2%
2.7%Dividend yield4.7%
€4.00Dividend per share$5.06
Profitability
10%Operating margin20%
2.36×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.86×
6%Return on equity112%
3%Return on assets10%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
5.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-5.1%
14.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-2.1%
+18.0%Value creation/yr+4.1%
Balance & size
14.1×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.7×
0.18×Debt / equity4.31×
$92BMarket cap$36B
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

EssilorLuxottica S. A. leads: 8 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

EssilorLuxottica S. A.of which business quality 63 · market factors 29 Kimberly-Clarkof which business quality 54 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
37
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
42
19
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
72
52
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
75
35
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
58
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
80
86
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
70
90

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyEssilorLuxottica S. A.Price €150Kimberly-ClarkPrice $108
DCF Models+9%close to the price€163-40%below the price$64.39
Earnings-Based-60%below the price€59.74-46%below the price$58.23
Dividend Discount-86%below the price€20.94-46%below the price$58.82
Multiples-34%below the price€99.39-11%close to the price$96.51
Asset-Based-62%below the price€56.69-97%below the price$3.03
Growth DCF0%close to the price€150-50%below the price$53.91
Economic Profit-58%below the price€62.21-68%below the price$34.83
Growth Earnings-35%below the price€97.85-10%close to the price$96.73
Minimum-86%below the price€20.94-97%below the price$3.03
Maximum+9%close to the price€163-10%close to the price$96.73
Median-47%below the price€80.03-46%below the price$58.52
Geometric mean-50%below the price€75.48-60%below the price$43.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

EssilorLuxottica S. A.: 19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Kimberly-Clark: 21 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

EssilorLuxottica S. A.
Bear €67.19Fair Value €94.93Bull €126
€150 = current price (white tick)
Kimberly-Clark
Bear $50.13Fair Value $79.71Bull $118
$108 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

EssilorLuxottica S. A. · Health Care

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-37% · below median

Kimberly-Clark · Consumer Staples

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-26% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Kimberly-Clark as the less overvalued of the two: EssilorLuxottica S. A. trades at €150 versus a fair value of €94.93 (-37%), while Kimberly-Clark trades at $108 versus $79.71 (-26%).

EssilorLuxottica S. A. has the higher quality score (63/100).

See the full analysis →
EssilorLuxottica S. A. · Kimberly-Clark

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to EssilorLuxottica S. A.

Eli Lilly and vs UnitedHealth GroupJohnson & Johnson vs UnitedHealth GroupAbbVie vs UnitedHealth GroupMerck & Company vs UnitedHealth Group

Related to Kimberly-Clark

Altria vs WalmartCostco Wholesale vs AltriaCoca-Cola vs AltriaAltria vs Procter & Gamble
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.