International Games System Co vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how International Games System Co (3293) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: International Games System Co trades at TWD 750 versus a fair value of TWD 568 (-24%), while NetEase trades at $123 versus $172 (+40%).
International Games System Co
3293.TWO · TWD · Communication Services
-24%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 750
Fair ValueTWD 568
Quality77/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+40%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$123
Fair Value$172
Quality81/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
International Games System CoNetEase
Valuation
18.6×P/E (TTM)16.9×
8.65×P/S (TTM)4.99×
10.41×P/B3.56×
14.3×EV/EBITDA12.9×
—PEG1.45×
5.1%Dividend yield2.3%
TWD 36.00Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
50%Net margin30%
58%Operating margin41%
99%Return on equity22%
31%Return on assets11%
Growth
17%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
22.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
21.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.00×
$6BMarket cap$85B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
International Games System Co leads: 8 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
International Games System Coof which business quality 77 · market factors 59NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
92
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
84
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
50
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
89
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
International Games System Co
DCF ModelsTWD 1,121
Earnings-BasedTWD 920
Dividend DiscountTWD 510
MultiplesTWD 421
Asset-BasedTWD 45.31
Growth DCFTWD 891
Economic ProfitTWD 460
Growth EarningsTWD 1,219
13 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
NetEase
DCF Models$1,935
Earnings-Based$1,296
Dividend Discount$370
Multiples$835
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,772
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,703
0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
International Games System Co
Bear TWD 427Fair Value TWD 568Bull TWD 1,584
TWD 750 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $129Fair Value $172Bull $282
$123 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
International Games System Co · Communication Services
Quality score77 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-24% · below median
NetEase · Communication Services
Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+40% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: International Games System Co trades at TWD 750 versus a fair value of TWD 568 (-24%), while NetEase trades at $123 versus $172 (+40%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
